Friday, February 6, 2009

is gay movement (gay marriage) a civil rights issue?

people often compare gay marriages with interracial marriages. Specifically they say “well 100 yrs ago people of 2 races cannot get married but they can now, people of the same gender is not allowed to get married today and by the same reasoning that they should be allowed to get married just like people of different races”. let me just say as a minority myself that this comparison is totally inappropriate. One cannot compare race issue with gay issue. These 2 things are totally separate. If this approach of piggyback one movement on the previous movement is valid then what stops people who promote under age marriage from piggyback onto the gay movement? what prevents polygamist, beastiality people, etc. from also claiming “gee you let gays get married then why can’t we get married?” When people ask me “so interracial marriage is ok, then why can’t gay marriages be ok?” I ask them “let’s suppose gay marriages are legal, how would you respond if someone ask you a similar question that if gay marriage is ok, then why isn’t underage, polygamist, or even beastality marriage legal? If you say gender is not an issue, then people will say then why is age, number, and species matter in marriages?” once they hear my response I can see those gay activists are confused in their mind because they know the validity of this argument and they have nothing solid to respond. Often time they just respond something like “whatever” and resume their hateful name calling tactics. Their ignorant behavior clearly shows me that reasoning is NOT on their side contrary to what they claim. In addition, all of the people I’ve met who make such comparison between race and homosexuality are liberal white americans. Man, I say those libral white americans are ignorant and have no true understanding of what civil rights movement really is. Having someone stating that civil rights movement and gay marriage movements are the same is like hearing some libral white american stating that koreans and japanese are the same. Dude, give me a break. You stupid white libral americans. I have NEVER EVER hear a minority making such ignorant comparison.

2nd, if someone finds a bone and believes it’s a definiative proof of evolution and takes this bone to Dr. Darwin (assumes he is still alive). After careful examination Darwin himself declares this bone is nothing but a KFC chicken bone and means nothing to his theory of revolution. When Darwin himself, the creator of the theory of evolution, says something is not a proof of evolution that means a LOT. Because he will be the most enthusiastic person to embrace anything that supports his theory. when he rejects a proof that means it really is not a proof. so why am I tell you this example? well, african americans are the group that founded the modern civil rights movement, they’ve talk the talk, walk the walk, many of them died for their cause. and they continue to carry on the fight for civil rights. If the gay movement is truely part of the civil rights movement, then of course the african american community will open their arms to embrace it. But the reality is that OVERWHELMING percentage of the african americans and civil rights leaders say the gay movement is NOT a part of the civil rights movement. And as a matter of fact they resent such comparison. This goes to show you that gay marriage movements are so lacking support that they unilaterally piggy back on the civil rights movement in order to gain legitamcy.

In the next postings I will discuss the proposition 8 in california, my view of gay marriages, etc. stay tuned

2 comments:

  1. this is reponse to the comments above:

    If there is overpopulation then the gene of abstinance should kick in as seen very frequently in mammal world i.e. when food is scarce mammals often skip a reproduction cycle and skip mating season. No mammal on record when food is scarce and population is great turn systematically to gay behivors on purpose.


    if you insist on comparing gay marriages w/ interracial marriages, then I asked you how you can reconcile your different in treatment of gays and unborn babies. see this posting http://commonsenseduh.blogspot.com/2009/03/gay-marriages-vs-abortion.html

    ReplyDelete