Here is an interesting thought. Let's say you live in 1900s where women in united states cannot vote and there is a movement called "let's allow white women to vote". This movement explicitly did NOT include minority women. Anyone other than white supremacists would ask why this movement only covers white women? what about black, asian, hispanic, and native american women? The answer from "let's allow white women to vote" activists is that there are more white women and white women are the major so let's worry about the majority first and maybe we'll revisit later about minority women's rights to vote. For now, let's worry about the "important" group i.e. white women." Wouldn't you say this movement is a hateful, discriminatory, racist movement that reaffirms white society's degrading views on minorities. what do you mean by "let's worry about the majority white women?" huh? why can't the movement include all women? wouldn't you fervently against this movement because it's so called discrimination in mask?
well, same exact thing with gay movement. There are many other groups than gays who currently cannot get benefits as married couples. For example, an 80 year old lady and her 60 year old daughter who where never married. The mother and the daughter live together in the same apartment, contributing money to sustain themselves. They depend on each other in a partnership, and they love each other in the mother-daughter way. How they depend on each other and support each other are exactly the same as heterosexual or some gay couples do. But currently they do not get any benefits married couples or civil unioned gays get. Nothing. I.e. they are treated worse than gays if you take gay's argument. Another example are 2 old sisters living together. They are never married to anyone else, and they are not incestuous lesbians i.e. they are just living together as 2 sister would. Supporting and depending on each other. They don't have any of the rights traditionally married couples or civil unioned gay couples do. In other words, there are many other groups who have the same plight and have met with same or worse discrimination than gays do. Yet the gay movement deliberately ignored them just like in my example the "let's allow white women to vote" movement deliberately ignored minority women. By forcing majority of americans to accept gays' definition of marriage, it still does not at ALL address the need of other discriminated groups. The mother and daughter and the 2 sisters obviously cannot get married and they don't want to. Why should they suffer because they are in a non-sexual partnership? By not including them in the solution gay movement offers in essence is discriminating them the same way the "let's allow white women to vote" movement is discriminating against minorities. And that make gay movement hateful and biased.
if gays are not a bunch of hateful and discriminatory bigots, they, instead of proposing to change the definition of marriage which does NOT help the mother/daugher and 2 old sisters groups, would and should push for a more balanced solution by revisiting why our nation is distributing benefits and rights based on marriage or even civil unions. Even if gay marriages or civil unions are fully allowed, 2 people will still have to in essence f*ck each other in order to get benefits/rights. Why do 2 people have to f*ck (whether heteralsexually or homosexually) in order to get beneifts and rights? why can't gays push for giving benefits based on any partnerships even non sexual ones? In french domestic partnership is granted to people like mother/daughter and 2 old sisters. Just like people asked in my example why can't we have a movement that allow all women to vote which address the suffrage issue for all women I ask why can't gays come up with a solution that addresses the inequality of all groups? If the "let's allow white women to vote" activists insist there is no way to include minority groups in their movement I must say they are either stupid or hateful. And this is what I say about gay activists because their solution only caters to their need while ignoring and discriminating the others just like "let's allow white women to vote" solution.
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Friday, August 21, 2009
this is why people hate democrats
As a part of budget cut in California, democrats included a 4 billion cut on correctional facilities (jails) You would think that saving would come from cutting back on the money spent on prisoners by cutting down some of the ridiculous treatment prisoners gets and cut back on the frivolous pay prison unions get. WRONG. They are proposing to release 40,000 prisoners. While they claim these 40,000 criminals are going to be non-violent ones but there are some significant issues they conveniently "forgot" to mention to Californians.
1. The reason why we spent so much money on prisons was because we have many crimes committed. Democrats passed laws that made california very attractive to illegal immigrants and many of the crimes are commited by illegal immigrants. Democrats also dominate the school board and california schools are the WORST in the country. 30% drop out rate, 40% of students can't meet basic math and reading requirement. Yet california public schools spend twice as much as california private schools per student and achieve a fraction of the results that private schools deliver. Democrats controlled public school system produced MOST of the new crimes. What do you think those disrespectful highschool drop out do? Many commit crimes! And there are many more examples. Democrats created the crime situation in California and failed to stop it. There are no one else to blame than democrats since they overwhelmingly dominate the state government.
2. The reason why prison system here in california costs almost double as neighboring state such as nevanda per prisoner is because Democrats gave almost unrestricted benefits to prison unions. The previous CA governor gray davis gave unions a 30% raise. Have you ever gotten a 30% pay raise? and relaxed the rules on overtime as a result the cost per prisoner skyrocketed and money paid to overtime went thru the roof and unchecked. The bottom line is californians give money/tax to the government to have the government do service for them but instead democrats stole the money by giving it to labor unions who then later paid democrats back in the form of campaign contributions. Since they stole so much money, we are now running out of money to do service for californians such as locking up criminals. But instead of stop stealing, democrats continue to give labor union high benefit and are planning to release criminals to terrorize law abiding citizens. The plan is obvious, when enough californians are victimized by the criminals that democrats released califnornians will be forced to raise taxes i.e. put more money in the pot for democrats to steal more and give to labor unions so they can get kickbacks later during election times. this is so evil and devious. Californians have voted to say no to new taxes thru the recent initiatives. But democrats are so devious they are deliberately releasing criminals to force us to pay.
3. There are many other ways to reduce prison cost than releasing criminials on the street. How about make criminals work? IF they have so much energy to fight in prisons all the time, then they should spend the energy to work! How about having prisoners doing 3 shifts? i.e. mid night to 8am, group1 sleeps, from 8am to 4pm group 2 sleeps, from 4pm to midnight group 3 sleeps. This will increase the prison capacity by 300%. And doing shifts is ok because millions of Americans are working on midnight and graveyard shifts. If law abiding Americans can do shifts, why can't criminals?
4. Criminals are in jail for a reason whether big or small crimes or nonvilent or violent crimes. The bottom line is that they have victimize others and that's why they are in jail. If you let them get off easier you are in essense training them to commit more crime. This is much like if a child misbehaves you need correct him right away otherwise the child will misbehave more and more. If a child pushes another child, a bad parent will say "whatever, I have no energy to correct him, as long as he does hit and injure another child", well guess what? by doing nothing or little you are actually encouraging bad behaviors and eventually the child will hit and injure another child. And we call this irresponsible parenting. what democrats are doing is irresponsible governing. Can we say "gee health care cost is so high so people are not allowed to see doctors unless they have a severe health issues. so if you have an infection, you can't see a doctor" well, by doing this you are actually making sure there are going to be an endless cases of severe health issues by not treating the problem when they are still treatable. If you have an infection, it's best to treat it early on than to wait until your arm needs to be amputated. Same thing with crime, when a criminal breaks into cars and you do little to punish him, he will commit more crimes, then he realizes if he gets caught all he gets is 10 hours of community service, a few counseling session, and 1 day of house arrest (gee I have to stay home and watch tv) then he will go up the crime ladder by committing burglery. And then he will move on to commit assault, then robbery, and then and only then you are arresting him. This will actually produce a endless stream of serious and violent criminals because your lax punishment are making car theives into violent criminals over time. If you look at the profile of criminals most of them started small then go up the crime ladder because they think they are above the law. By having lax punishment for small time criminals you are actually helping more of them go up the crime ladder and in the process millions of americans will suffer as a result of democrats irresponsible actions.
The sad thing is that liberal in general are so stupid and arrogant and incapable of thinking that they are going along with democrats on this issue with out even asking basic questions. And when liberals get mugged, robbed, and having their cars vandalized they still are so stupid to not realize who the real culprit is and blame republicans by not taxing more. Our country is in trouble as long as we have selfing absorbing and arrogant liberal crack heads thinking they know what they are talking about.
1. The reason why we spent so much money on prisons was because we have many crimes committed. Democrats passed laws that made california very attractive to illegal immigrants and many of the crimes are commited by illegal immigrants. Democrats also dominate the school board and california schools are the WORST in the country. 30% drop out rate, 40% of students can't meet basic math and reading requirement. Yet california public schools spend twice as much as california private schools per student and achieve a fraction of the results that private schools deliver. Democrats controlled public school system produced MOST of the new crimes. What do you think those disrespectful highschool drop out do? Many commit crimes! And there are many more examples. Democrats created the crime situation in California and failed to stop it. There are no one else to blame than democrats since they overwhelmingly dominate the state government.
2. The reason why prison system here in california costs almost double as neighboring state such as nevanda per prisoner is because Democrats gave almost unrestricted benefits to prison unions. The previous CA governor gray davis gave unions a 30% raise. Have you ever gotten a 30% pay raise? and relaxed the rules on overtime as a result the cost per prisoner skyrocketed and money paid to overtime went thru the roof and unchecked. The bottom line is californians give money/tax to the government to have the government do service for them but instead democrats stole the money by giving it to labor unions who then later paid democrats back in the form of campaign contributions. Since they stole so much money, we are now running out of money to do service for californians such as locking up criminals. But instead of stop stealing, democrats continue to give labor union high benefit and are planning to release criminals to terrorize law abiding citizens. The plan is obvious, when enough californians are victimized by the criminals that democrats released califnornians will be forced to raise taxes i.e. put more money in the pot for democrats to steal more and give to labor unions so they can get kickbacks later during election times. this is so evil and devious. Californians have voted to say no to new taxes thru the recent initiatives. But democrats are so devious they are deliberately releasing criminals to force us to pay.
3. There are many other ways to reduce prison cost than releasing criminials on the street. How about make criminals work? IF they have so much energy to fight in prisons all the time, then they should spend the energy to work! How about having prisoners doing 3 shifts? i.e. mid night to 8am, group1 sleeps, from 8am to 4pm group 2 sleeps, from 4pm to midnight group 3 sleeps. This will increase the prison capacity by 300%. And doing shifts is ok because millions of Americans are working on midnight and graveyard shifts. If law abiding Americans can do shifts, why can't criminals?
4. Criminals are in jail for a reason whether big or small crimes or nonvilent or violent crimes. The bottom line is that they have victimize others and that's why they are in jail. If you let them get off easier you are in essense training them to commit more crime. This is much like if a child misbehaves you need correct him right away otherwise the child will misbehave more and more. If a child pushes another child, a bad parent will say "whatever, I have no energy to correct him, as long as he does hit and injure another child", well guess what? by doing nothing or little you are actually encouraging bad behaviors and eventually the child will hit and injure another child. And we call this irresponsible parenting. what democrats are doing is irresponsible governing. Can we say "gee health care cost is so high so people are not allowed to see doctors unless they have a severe health issues. so if you have an infection, you can't see a doctor" well, by doing this you are actually making sure there are going to be an endless cases of severe health issues by not treating the problem when they are still treatable. If you have an infection, it's best to treat it early on than to wait until your arm needs to be amputated. Same thing with crime, when a criminal breaks into cars and you do little to punish him, he will commit more crimes, then he realizes if he gets caught all he gets is 10 hours of community service, a few counseling session, and 1 day of house arrest (gee I have to stay home and watch tv) then he will go up the crime ladder by committing burglery. And then he will move on to commit assault, then robbery, and then and only then you are arresting him. This will actually produce a endless stream of serious and violent criminals because your lax punishment are making car theives into violent criminals over time. If you look at the profile of criminals most of them started small then go up the crime ladder because they think they are above the law. By having lax punishment for small time criminals you are actually helping more of them go up the crime ladder and in the process millions of americans will suffer as a result of democrats irresponsible actions.
The sad thing is that liberal in general are so stupid and arrogant and incapable of thinking that they are going along with democrats on this issue with out even asking basic questions. And when liberals get mugged, robbed, and having their cars vandalized they still are so stupid to not realize who the real culprit is and blame republicans by not taxing more. Our country is in trouble as long as we have selfing absorbing and arrogant liberal crack heads thinking they know what they are talking about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)